🔗 Share this article

When I am a game master, I traditionally steered clear of significant use of randomization during my Dungeons & Dragons sessions. My preference was for narrative flow and session development to be guided by player choice instead of the roll of a die. Recently, I chose to change my approach, and I'm incredibly pleased with the outcome.

The Inspiration: Watching an Improvised Tool

A popular actual-play show utilizes a DM who regularly requests "chance rolls" from the adventurers. The process entails selecting a specific dice and defining consequences tied to the result. It's essentially no different from rolling on a random table, these are created spontaneously when a player's action lacks a clear conclusion.

I opted to test this technique at my own table, mostly because it looked novel and presented a departure from my standard routine. The experience were fantastic, prompting me to reconsider the ongoing dynamic between pre-determination and improvisation in a D&D campaign.

An Emotional In-Game Example

In a recent session, my group had survived a massive conflict. When the dust settled, a player wondered if two key NPCs—a pair—had made it. Rather than choosing an outcome, I handed it over to chance. I instructed the player to roll a d20. The possible results were: a low roll, both were killed; on a 5-9, a single one succumbed; on a 10+, they made it.

The player rolled a 4. This resulted in a deeply moving sequence where the characters came upon the corpses of their allies, still clasped together in their final moments. The cleric conducted a ceremony, which was especially significant due to earlier story developments. In a concluding gesture, I improvised that the NPCs' bodies were suddenly restored, showing a enchanted item. I rolled for, the bead's magical effect was perfectly what the group required to address another major story problem. It's impossible to script this type of perfect coincidences.

Improving DM Agility

This experience led me to ponder if chance and spontaneity are in fact the essence of tabletop RPGs. Even if you are a prep-heavy DM, your ability to adapt can rust. Players often excel at upending the most carefully laid plots. Therefore, a effective DM needs to be able to pivot effectively and fabricate scenarios in real-time.

Using on-the-spot randomization is a excellent way to develop these talents without going completely outside your comfort zone. The key is to apply them for low-stakes situations that won't drastically alter the session's primary direction. For instance, I would not employ it to establish if the main villain is a secret enemy. But, I could use it to determine if the party reach a location right after a major incident unfolds.

Strengthening Shared Narrative

Spontaneous randomization also helps maintain tension and foster the impression that the game world is alive, evolving in reaction to their choices in real-time. It combats the perception that they are merely pawns in a pre-written script, thereby bolstering the collaborative aspect of the game.

This approach has always been embedded in the game's DNA. Early editions were reliant on charts, which made sense for a playstyle focused on treasure hunting. Even though modern D&D frequently emphasizes story and character, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, it's not necessarily the required method.

Achieving the Right Balance

Absolutely no issue with doing your prep. Yet, there is also nothing wrong with stepping back and letting the whim of chance to determine certain outcomes instead of you. Direction is a big factor in a DM's role. We use it to facilitate play, yet we can be reluctant to cede it, in situations where doing so could be beneficial.

My final advice is this: Don't be afraid of relinquishing a bit of control. Try a little chance for smaller details. You might just create that the organic story beat is infinitely more memorable than anything you could have pre-written by yourself.