🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on expanding your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after popular discussions indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors men who employ professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", described remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her audience decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were more personal - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" described a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."