🔗 Share this article

Picture the following: a smiling the Danish striker wearing Napoli's colors. Next, juxtapose it with a sad-looking Benjamin Sesko sporting United's jersey, looking as if he just missed an open goal. Do not bother locating a real picture of him missing; context is the enemy. Now, include statistics in a large, silly font. Remember some emoticons. Share it everywhere.

Would you mention that Højlund's tally includes strikes in the premier European competition while Sesko isn't playing in continental tournaments? Of course not. Nor would you highlight that several of Højlund's goals came against Belarus and Greece, or that his national team is far superior to Slovenia and creates far more chances. If you manage online for a large outlet, raw engagement is your livelihood, United are the biggest draw, and nuance is your sworn enemy.

Thus the wheel of content spins. Your next task is to sift through a lengthy podcast featuring the legendary goalkeeper and find the part where he describes the acquisition of Sesko "weird". Just before, where he qualifies his comments by saying, "I have nothing bad to say about Benjamin Sesko"... yes, cut that. Nobody needs that. Simply ensure "strange" and "the player" are paired in the headline. People will be furious.

The Season of Potential and Premature Judgment

The heart of fall has traditionally one of my favourite times to observe football. Leaves fall, the wind turns, the teams and tactics are still fresh, all is novel and yet everything is beginning to form. Key players of the coming months are staking their claims. The transfer window is shut. No one is talking about the quadruple yet. Everyone are in contention. At this precise point, all is possibility.

However, for many of the same reasons, mid-autumn has also been one of my most disliked times to consume news on football. Because although nothing has yet been settled, opinions must be formed immediately. Jack Grealish is reborn. Florian Wirtz has been a major letdown. Could Semenyo be the top performer in the league right now? Please a decision immediately.

Sesko as The Prime Example

And for numerous reasons, Benjamin Sesko feels like the archetype in this context, a player caught between football's opposing, unavoidable forces. The need to withhold final conclusions, allowing technical development and tactical sophistication to develop. And the imperative to produce instant definitive judgment, a conveyor belt of takes and memes, out-of-context criticisms and meaningless contrasts, a puzzle that can not truly be circled.

It is not my aim to offer a substantive analysis of Sesko's stint at United to date. The guy has been in the lineup on four occasions in the Premier League in a highly unpredictable team, scored two goals, and had a mere of 116 touches. What precisely are we analysing? Nor do I propose to replicate the pundits' seminal masterwork "Argument Over Benjamin Sesko", in which two famous analysts argue passionately on a popular show over whether Sesko needs 10 goals to be a success this year (one pundit), or whether it's really more like 12 or 13 (the other).

A Harsh Reality

Despite this I enjoyed watching him at his former club: a big, screeching sports car of a striker, playing in a team ideally suited to his abilities: given the freedom to attack but also the freedom to miss. Partly this is why United feels like the cruellest place he could possibly be right now: a place where "brutal verdicts" are handed down in about the time it takes to load a pre-roll ad, the club with the largest and most pitiless gulf between the time and air he needs, and the opportunity he is going to get.

We saw a case of this during the international break, when a widely shared infographic handily stated that the player had been judged – decisively – the worst signing of the summer transfer window by a survey of football representatives. And of course, the media are not alone in this. Club channels, online personalities, anonymous X accounts with a suspiciously high number of fake followers: all parties with a vested interest is now essentially operating along the identical rules, an ecosystem explicitly nosed towards controversy.

The Mental Cost

Scroll, scroll, tap, scroll. What is happening to ourselves? Are we aware, on any level, what this infinite sluice of irritation is doing to our brains? Separate from the inherent strangeness of being a player in the center of it all, aware on some surreal butterfly-effect level that each aspect about them is now basically material, product, public property to be repackaged and traded.

Indeed, partly this is because it's Manchester United, the corpse that continues to feed the cycle, a big club that must always be generating the big feelings. But also, partly this is a temporary malaise, a pendulum of judgment most clearly and cruelly observed at this time of year, roughly four weeks after the window has closed. All summer long we have been coveting players, praising them, drooling over them. Yet, only a handful of games later, a lot of those same players are now being disdained as failures. Is it time to worry about a new signing? Did Arsenal actually need Viktor Gyökeres wise? What was the point of another expensive buy?

A Wider Issue

It seems fitting that Sesko meets their rivals on the weekend: a team at once on a long unbeaten run at home in the league and somehow in their own situation of feverish crisis, like filing a missing person’s report on a person who popped to the store half an hour ago. Too open. Mohamed Salah past his prime. Alexander Isak an expensive flop. Arne Slot losing his hair.

Maybe we have failed to understand the way the narrative of football has begun to supplant football the actual game, to influence the way we view it, an whole competition repivoted around discussion topics and immediate responses, something that happens in the backdrop while we browse through our devices, incapable to disconnect from the saline drip of takes and more takes. It may be Sesko taking the hit at present. But in a way, everyone is losing something here.